2 August 2018

"Strange metals" just got stranger

MagLab physicist Arkady Shekhter described the finding as a new way metals can conduct electricity. MagLab physicist Arkady Shekhter described the finding as a new way metals can conduct electricity. David Barfield

A material already known for its unique behavior is found to carry current in a way never before observed.

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Scientists at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (National MagLab) have discovered a behavior in materials called cuprates that suggests they carry current in a way entirely different from conventional metals such as copper. The research, published today in the prestigious journal Science, adds new meaning to their moniker, "strange metals."

Cuprates are high-temperature superconductors (HTS), meaning they can carry current without any loss of energy at somewhat warmer temperatures than conventional, low-temperature superconductors (LTS). Although scientists understand the physics of LTS, they haven’t yet cracked the nut of HTS materials. Exactly how the electrons travel through these materials remains the biggest mystery in the field.

For their research on one specific cuprate, lanthanum strontium copper oxide (LSCO), a team led by MagLab physicist Arkady Shekhter focused on its normal, metallic state — the state from which superconductivity eventually emerges when the temperature dips low enough. This normal state of cuprates is known as a "strange" or "bad" metal, in part because the electrons don't conduct electricity particularly well.

Scientists have studied conventional metals for more than a century, and generally agree on how electricity travels through them. They call the units that carry charge through those metals "quasiparticles," which are essentially electrons after you've factored in their environment. These quasiparticles act nearly independently of each other as they carry electric charge through a conductor.

figureSchematic doping-field-temperature phase diagram in the vicinity of critical doping.
Reprinted with permission from Giraldo-Gallo et al., Science (2 August 2018).
But does quasiparticle flow also explain how electric current travels in the cuprates? At the National MagLab's Pulsed Field Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Shekhter and his team investigated the question. They put LSCO in a very high magnetic field, applied a current to it, then measured the resistance.

The resulting data revealed that the current can not, in fact, travel via conventional quasiparticles, as it does in copper or doped silicon. The normal metallic state of the cuprate, it appeared, was anything but normal.

"This is a new way metals can conduct electricity that is not a bunch of quasiparticles flying around, which is the only well-understood and well-agreed-upon language so far," said Shekhter. "Most metals work like that."

So, if not by quasiparticles, exactly how is charge being carried in the strange metal phase of LSCO? Shekhter's group wanted to understand that, too. Their data suggests it may be some kind of team effort by the electrons.

Scientists have known for some time about an intriguing behavior of LSCO: In its normal conducting state, resistivity changes linearly with temperature. In other words, as the temperature goes up, LSCO's resistance to electrical current goes up proportionately, which is not the case in conventional metals.

THE TOOLS THEY USED

100 tesla magnet

To conduct their experiments, the research team used three magnets from the MagLab’s Pulsed Field Facility, including the 60-Tesla Controlled Waveform Magnet, the 65-Tesla Multi-Shot Magnet and the world-record 100-Tesla Multi-Shot Magnet (pictured above).

Shekhter and his colleagues decided to test LSCO's resistivity, but using magnetic field as a parameter instead of temperature. They put the material in a very powerful magnet and measured resistivity in fields up to 80 teslas (a hospital MRI magnet, by comparison, generates a field of about 3 teslas). They discovered another case of linear resistivity: As the strength of the magnetic field increased, LSCO's resistivity went up proportionately.

The fact that the linear-in-field resistivity mirrored so elegantly the previously known linear-in-temperature resistivity of LSCO is highly significant, said Shekhter.

"Usually when you see such things, that means that it's a very simple principle behind it," he said.

The finding suggests the electrons seem to cooperate as they move through the material. Physicists have believed for some time that HTS materials exhibit such a "correlated electron behavior" in the superconducting phase, although the precise mechanism is not yet understood. But this new evidence suggests that LSCO in its normal conducting state may also carry current using something other than independent quasiparticles — although it's not superconductivity, either. What that "something" is, scientists aren't yet certain. Finding the answer may require a whole new way of looking at the problem.

"Here we have a situation where no existing language can help," Shekhter said. "We need to find a new language to think about these materials."

The new research raises plenty of questions and some tantalizing ideas, including ideas about the fundamentally different way in which resistivity could be tuned in cuprates. In conventional metals, explained Shekhter, resistivity can be tuned in multiple ways — imagine a set of dials, any of which could adjust that property.

But in cuprates, Shekhter said, "There is only one dial to adjust resistivity. And both temperature and magnetic field, in their own way, access that one dial."

Odd, indeed. But from strange metals, one would expect nothing less.

Scientists from numerous institutions contributed to this study. They include (listed as they appear in the citation): Paula Giraldo-Gallo (National MagLab and the Universidad de los Andes); Jose A. Galvis (National MagLab and Universidad Central); Zachary Stegen (National MagLab and FSU); Kim Modic (Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids); Fedor Balakirev and Jonathan Betts (Los Alamos National Lab); Xiujun Lian and Camille Moir (National MagLab and FSU); Scott Riggs (National MagLab); Jie Wu and Anthony Bollinger (Brookhaven National Lab); X. He (Brookhaven and Yale University); Brad Ramshaw (LANL and Cornell University); Ross McDonald (LANL); and MagLab Director Greg Boebinger.

— Story by Kristen Coyne


The National High Magnetic Field Laboratory is the world’s largest and highest-powered magnet facility. Located at Florida State University, the University of Florida and Los Alamos National Laboratory, the interdisciplinary National MagLab hosts scientists from around the world to perform basic research in high magnetic fields, advancing our understanding of materials, energy and life. The lab is funded by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1644779) and the state of Florida. For more information, visit us online at nationalmaglab.org or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest at NationalMagLab.